Advertisement

newsInvestigations

U.S. Supreme Court declines to take up Texas death row case involving police hypnosis

The high court denied Charles Don Flores’ petition for review without comment, leaving it up to Texas legislators to determine whether police should continue the controversial practice.

AUSTIN — The U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear an appeal from a Texas death row inmate who argued that hypnosis helped convict him of murder.

The decision was a blow to inmate Charles Don Flores, who was sentenced to death for the murder of Farmers Branch resident Elizabeth “Betty” Black in 1998. It was also a setback for critics of the use of hypnosis by Texas law enforcement officers, who had hoped the Supreme Court would rule that investigative hypnosis is junk science that has no place in U.S. courts

Flores’ lawyer, Gretchen Sween, said she will continue to fight for her client’s release from prison, but she wished the high court had taken a look at how hypnosis helped put him there.

Advertisement

“I do think one of the positive things that has come out of this litigation is that Charles’ case has unsettled a lot of people. There is a lack of awareness that this is something the police do,” Sween said Monday.

Breaking News

Get the latest breaking news from North Texas and beyond.

Or with:

Investigative hypnosis is a technique used by police attempting to guide witnesses or victims into a trance so they might better recall details of a crime. A Dallas Morning News investigative series published last year revealed Texas has become the country’s premier destination for police hypnosis — both in training and practice — even though the scientific consensus is that the practice can warp memories.

Advertisement

While many other states ban the testimony of people who have been hypnotized, or bar the introduction of evidence elicited during hypnosis sessions, law enforcement officers in Texas have used hypnosis to investigate hundreds of crimes over the years, sending dozens to prison — and some to their deaths.

Flores challenged his conviction based on the fact that police tried to use hypnosis to refresh the memory of a witness who saw two men enter Black’s home on the morning of the crime. The justices denied his petition for review without comment Monday.

Sween said this decision meant the court decided not to take up the case; it did not make any judgment on the merits of the case or the challenge against investigative hypnosis.

Advertisement

She will now return to state court and continue fighting to overturn Flores’ conviction on other grounds. While declining to provide specific details about her upcoming argument, Sween said she has recently learned additional details about the prosecution that raised questions about her client’s conviction.

“There are other quasi-science [methods] that were used in the guilt phase of trial that would not withstand scrutiny,” Sween said. “We’re challenging the fundamental fairness of the entire trial.”

When asked whether she will continue to challenge the use of hypnosis in Flores’ case, Sween added, “wait and see.”

Now that the Supreme Court has declined to take up the issue of investigative hypnosis nationwide, the clearest path for challenging the practice here is through the state Legislature. Earlier this year, two Texas lawmakers filed bills to ban the introduction of hypnotically-induced testimony in state courts.

Rep. Eddie Lucio III, one of the bill authors, said Texans deserve to have faith in the system.

“We need as much integrity in the criminal justice system as possible. The stakes are high. A person’s life — there’s no amount, there’s no dollar value you can place on [that],” Lucio, D-Brownsville, told The News in an interview on the first day of the 2021 legislative session.

Sen. Juan “Chuy’' Hinojosa credited The News’ series for revealing the extent to which police in Texas rely on hypnosis to investigate crimes: “It just confirms the depths of the problem.”

Advertisement

Hinojosa said he would have preferred the Supreme Court take up the issue and set a nationwide standard for investigative hypnosis. Without that, he said it is up to state lawmakers like him to crack down on the practice.

“This issue needs to be resolved on a state-by-state basis, as we are currently trying to do,” Hinojosa said Monday. “This is an issue of nationwide importance to our criminal justice system. Hypnosis is junk science.”